CO129-508-5 Supreme Court of Hong Kong- slackness of registry accounting methods 28-10-1927 - 23-4-1928 — Page 122

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All

122

A:36

Q:36A

A:36A

Q:37

A:37

Q:38

A:38

Q:39

A:39

Q.40

A:40

Q:41

A:41

.

I asked Hodge and he said that Wong had

put a bond to a firm of solicitors for $10,000. Wong was once a Government servant.

Interpreter at the Botanical gardens.

Did you inform Mr. Melbourne that Wong

was a man of substance?

I can't say whether I did. I believed it myself. I understood that he had property at

Kowloon city.

Did you keep the small record book of

auction sales?

Yes. It is in my handwriting.

You would be referring to it frequently.

Yes. Every few days.

Should not cash be paid in almost imme-

diately after sale?

Yes. Within 7 days of sale.

Did you not notice early in 1926 that great delays were occurring between sales and the

rendering of accounts?

I noticed a few times that cash was not being paid in. I saw Wong Fung Sek and he said that he had paid the money into Court. Afterwards he saw me and paid he had run short and asked if I could help him.

I then helped him. I gave him $3,000. This would be in about March, 1926. I never got it

back.

When Wong said he had paid in by cheque

did you look into the matter?

I found that some of the items which he

said had been paid had actually been paid and had

been entered up.

30

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.